Canadian Police Target Own Detective for Daring to Question Role of 'Covid Vaccines' in Death of 9 Babies
https://rairfoundation.com/canadian-...ive-interview/
Detective Helen Grus’s journey into uncovering the truth behind infant deaths possibly linked to COVID-19 vaccines culminates in a trial shadowed by allegations of police targeting.
Update: Monday, October 30, 2023
In a recent interview conducted by RAIR Foundation USA, retired Toronto Police Detective Donald Best sheds light on the ongoing trial of Detective Helen Grus from the Ottawa Police Service’s Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Unit (SACA). The trial has garnered significant attention due to its contentious nature, raising questions about the role of policing and the challenges faced by officers who seek to fulfill their duty with integrity.
The trial resumed after a six-week break on October 30, 2023, following a previous session in August, which was adjourned for unknown reasons for over nine weeks. The charges against Detective Grus involve one count of discreditable conduct under the Police Services Act, stemming from her initiation of an investigation into a potential link between vaccinated breastfeeding mothers and sudden infant deaths that occurred in January 2022. Despite supporting medical evidence and reports corroborating her concerns, she faces potential dismissal if found guilty of discreditable conduct for starting the investigation.
During the trial, testimony from Detective Butcher, one of Detective Grus’s colleagues, revealed a dismissive attitude toward her investigations and skepticism regarding any possible connection between vaccines and infant deaths. Additionally, text messages crucial to the case appear to have been either deleted or gone missing, further complicating the proceedings. The officers’ bias, due to their own vaccination status, casts doubt on their impartiality.
The case takes a political turn when it is revealed that in September 2021, higher-ups within the Ottawa Police Service ordered a ban on discussing vaccines within the unit responsible for investigating sudden infant deaths. This directive hampers the investigation and raises concerns about the independence and objectivity of law enforcement agencies.
Another disturbing revelation during the trial is the denial of access to Detective Grus’s own handwritten notes made during her investigations. These notes are considered crucial pieces of evidence in her defense, but their unavailability raises questions about the transparency and fairness of the proceedings.
The defense has filed motions to have Detective Grus’s memo books returned to her and to dismiss the case due to an abuse of procedure. However, the trial supervisor, Superintendent Chris Renwick, denied the request to hear the motion, further fueling claims of bias within the proceedings.
The trial also takes a concerning turn when it is revealed that the prosecutor and one of the prosecution’s primary witnesses are related by marriage, suggesting a potential conflict of interest that would be unacceptable in a criminal court setting.
The implications of Detective Grus’s trial extend beyond her individual case. It raises questions about the role of dutiful police officers who seek to fulfill their oath and investigative duties with integrity. Is political control, corporate influence, and fear of repercussions stifling the ability of officers to perform their duty objectively and without undue influence?
Update: Friday: August 18
In an exclusive interview with RAIR Foundation USA, retired Toronto Police Detective Donald Best unveils the shocking courtroom events of Friday, August 18. Both the prosecution and the designated judge exhibited bewildering tactics during the hearing, as described by Best.
An additional exclusive interview transpired on Friday, August 18th, subsequent to the hearing. The interview featured Canadian physician Dr. Mary O’Connor, who recounted a series of distressing incidents involving harassment and targeted actions by the Ontario College of Surgeons and Physicians. These actions were aimed at undermining her professional reputation and included illicit attempts to access her patient records.
Dr. O’Connor expounded upon the striking parallels between her own harrowing experiences and those of Detective Helen Grus, who valiantly pursued an inquiry into the fatalities of nine infants. Furthermore, she elucidated the resonance between the challenges encountered by medical professionals who have chosen to question the prevailing state narrative regarding the Covid “vaccines” and associated Covid measures.
————————————————–
In a startling and controversial case that has captured the attention of the nation, Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police Service’s Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Unit (SACA) finds herself at the center of a trial that has ignited a firestorm of debate and allegations of a cover-up. Grus’s investigation into a potential link between COVID-19 vaccines and sudden infant deaths (SIDS) has led to a cascade of events that raise questions about her motives, the influence of external agencies, and the integrity of her police force.
Between June 2020 and January 2022, Detective Grus, within her professional jurisdiction, examined a cluster of nine infant deaths that occurred within a condensed time frame. In September 2021, as vaccine mandates were introduced, Grus’s proactive approach led her to inquire whether the police force could be held accountable for vaccine-related injuries resulting from the mandates. This inquiry, which aligned with her duty to ensure public safety, may have inadvertently triggered the cascade of events that followed.
Grus’s concern was ignited by an alarming spike in sudden infant deaths, deviating significantly from the norm. While the SACA unit usually handles 2 to 3 infant deaths per year, the year 2021 witnessed a staggering total of seven such deaths, sending off alarm bells for Grus. Determined to unveil potential connections between these tragedies and COVID-19 vaccines, she ventured beyond her assigned cases.
In a recent interview with RAIR Foundation USA, retired Toronto Police Detective Donald Best emphasized the importance of officers initiating investigations to prevent undue political interference. Best viewed Grus’s actions as a diligent attempt to uphold her responsibilities as a police officer and protect the community from potential dangers.
However, controversy intensified as it came to light that the Public Health Agency of Canada might have influenced the police’s handling of Grus’s investigation. This allegation raised concerns of conflicts of interest and external manipulation, given the agency’s role in approving and mandating the COVID-19 vaccine.
Grus’s proactive approach extended to updating the SIDS questionnaire used by her unit, incorporating inquiries about COVID-19 mRNA injections. Her intent was to ensure comprehensive data collection, including information on vaccine-related adverse events. Grus believed this was an essential aspect of her duty to safeguard public health.
Further complicating matters, Grus found herself suspended from duty shortly after she began accumulating evidence related to her investigation. Coincidentally, her suspension occurred during the Freedom Convoy, a significant protest against COVID-19 vaccine mandates that gained prominence in Ottawa. This sequence of events prompted speculation regarding the potential political motivations behind her suspension.
The internal trial now facing Grus has drawn global attention as it deviates from a traditional criminal trial and occurs within the confines of the Ottawa Police Service. Despite her actions aligning with her job description, the consequences of the trial could be substantial, including termination or fines.
Critics of the situation argue that the case underscores a potential cover-up surrounding Grus’s investigation into the infant deaths. A significant point of contention is the alleged illegal surveillance of Detective Grus and her family, involving their electronic communications, phone records, social media accounts, and text messaging applications. The questionable legality of these wiretaps raises concerns about potential motives behind such actions.
As the hearings commenced at an Ottawa Police Station hearing room in the western part of the city, the eyes of the nation remain fixated on the proceedings. The trial of Detective Helen Grus embodies not only a debate about the limits of investigative pursuit by police officers but also broader questions about transparency, accountability, and potential external influences within the law enforcement community.
The trial is expected to last until at least Friday of this week. Its outcome will undoubtedly carry significant implications, serving as a precedent for permissible investigations by authorities not only in Canada but also potentially across North America. This trial transcends the fate of one officer; it speaks to the very legality of uncovering the truth, especially in matters as grave as the deaths of children.
Amid the trial’s proceedings, supporters of Detective Grus have gathered to hold a prayer session on her behalf, underscoring the weight and importance of the trial’s outcome.
