biggerbuds
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2009
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 1
my 250wattCFL gets about as hot as my 400watt cool tube to the touch,maybe a touch hotter.
bi0phreak420 said:Well my bottom line is that im using CFLs that's all I have to say about that
...and that is "fine"..No one is trying to "convert" you.bi0phreak420 said:Well my bottom line is that im using CFLs that's all I have to say about that
I broke it down in big lights in the above post. Now, for you, I'll break it down again with $$s.400 watt hps=50,000 L
150 watt flo=12,000 L (x3=36,000 L and consuming "more" energy)
Maybe we dont need to grow the same amount as an HPS user.The Hemp Goddess said:Well, that is fine if you want to spend twice as much to grow the same amount as those using HPS. But new growers deserve to know the facts.
bi0phreak420 said:This is the CFL i use and it works pretty good 125 watt ...2700k.....10,500 lumens
View attachment 161052
View attachment 161053
the numbers just don't lie....Sixx said:Maybe we dont need to grow the same amount as an HPS user.
Your comparison is not fair.... You are assuming we are gonna go buy 31 CFls to have 45K Lumens...When in actuality we are only using 8 or 10 CFLs.... You cant tell me 8 or 10 CFLs cost more to operate than a 400W HPS. True the 400W HPS is better, mainly due to the wattage and further reach. It has more lumens and wattage and penetration and and... We know. But from the studies I have done, the difference in end product is not as drastic as you make it sound. Im sure you know light diminishes over distance.... a 400W at 12 inches from the canopy dimishes over 50% of the lumens. Our CFLs at 1inch diminish 0% of the lumens. Not to mention Photosynthetic Active Radiation is the measure of light that a plant actually senses and uses, and it is the light the plant sees and can use that is more important then the actual output lumen of the grow lamp! Another benefit of using CFL’s is that they do not generate as much heat and can be kept almost on top of the plants producing the exact 100% photosynthetic active radiation light, with no loss of intensity. So if you position these lamps close to the leaves you get the benefit of 100% PAR light in the correct 400nw to 700nw range, giving the plant the correct light colours and light quality. You do not get 100% PAR light with an HID. The difference in yield is NOT night and day, it is much closer than most people think.
I think this involves "physics". I'm NOT well versed in the subject, BUT... this is how "I" understand it..
If you have two bulbs, consuming identical amounts of energy(watts), and one is producing 10,000 lumens, and the other is producing 5,000 Lumen. The one producing 5,000 will emit "more" heat.
Why?.. only half as much of the energy consumed, is being transformed into light, the other half "must" be transformed/emitted as heat. Is there some factor that I am not considering?.. energy consumed/work performed=efficiency ??
The way that "I" see it, 400 watts of "in"-efficient lighting is going to be harder to cool, than 400 watts of "efficient" lighting.
"IMO" you are going about the problem in reverse anyway. You need to calculate he amount of light needed/required to sufficiently light your space, and deal with that. Rather than try to control temperature by reducing your light.. "JMO"...
400 watt hps=50,000 L
150 watt flo=12,000 L (x3=36,000 L and consuming "more" energy)
If those extra 50 watts of energy are not being transformed into light, what is it being transformed into?
slowmo77 said:as a former CFL grower i've gotta say a few things here.
my first grow space was 2x2x4 and i had something like 14 cfl's 8 23watt and 6 were 42 watts. with that many lights i had heat issues but could get the lights very close to the plants.. i had nearly 100 bucks in lights and grew decent buds with them.
then i found these 150w HPS vapor tight lights. wow, they were like 20bucks each. they came with a sealed glass case around the bulb. those two lights replaced those cfls and i can place them right ontop of my plants as long as the plant don't touch the glass they're fine. i didn't have half the heat to deal with or the cords from all the light.
so it has been my experiance that lumen for lumen you can't beat an hps with a cfl. you can try but in the end as far as cost and power the hps will come out on top. im not saying you can't grow nice stuff with cfls because i grew some nice bud. these are just my thoughts
bi0phreak420 said:IM NOT USING 14 cfls im using 1...1 cfl LOOK AT THE PIC ABOVE
nova564t said:I thought I might put in my 2 cents, I grow and will continue to grow with CFLs because I have them and can't afford to spend any money on my room. Even though I grow very good bud with CFLs if I had the money and a little more room I would switch to HPS for bloom, but for now I'll just stick with what I got and stay high just the same!!:farm: :joint4:
bi0phreak420 said:YOU WANT FACTS.......the facts are that weed is exactly what we call it a weed it will grow without hps and cfls and nutes and all the other dumb **** that we do to it................
Enter your email address to join: