time4tokin20s
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2008
- Messages
- 614
- Reaction score
- 1,020
That's a cool set-up.Do you think a few cfl's would keep any stretching to a minimum in a LED grow like that?
KaliKitsune said:You'll have a great canopy with LEDs, but underneath, not so much. LEDs have poor canopy penetration due to their tuned wavelength.
papabeach1 said:dude..I understand you did the math with par compare with 400 watt
why not get the par match up with 600 watt hps so you can produce more
buds that could be possible IMO just go up with the lumens..
it might run u up like 430 watt.. I updated my thread on hid vs floursec
maybe can be helpful to you..
Elven said:Please keep up the experiment . Without trial and error there is no advancement.
this is why i prefer to use a large array of floro tubes when veggingRogue said:There has been a lot of talk and discussion this summer over light penetration.
Great Thread:http://www.marijuanapassion.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28104&highlight=penetration
I believe that having lights in multiple locations like my array should help over all penetration of light on the plant. It is like the use of multiple lights in photography to kill shadows. The shadow created by one leaf from source A gets light on it from source Z so there ends up being no shadow.
HydroManiac said:Rogue, any new pics??
Rogue said:I mis-placed my camera after last week. i just found it today. I'll take some shots tonight or tomorrow. They are doing good.
Elven said:Cant wait. hey how do you get your links in your signature like that.
Enter your email address to join: