OldSkool
Stubborn as an ol' mule..
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2009
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 24
I stand corrected. Thank you Hick. That's why I encourage all those to use correct terminolgy when speaking of observations in their grow. I have no problem with being corrected. It would seem that I've been laboring under a misapprehension for quite a while.
I would inquire as to how a plant, without the application of colchine, become strikingly similar to a plant with an inordinate number of chromosomes.
Is it just a 'fluke' to simulate a chromosomic condition?
HG, do you consider 1 and 1/2 inches wide across to be a sativa trait? or is it the shape of the leaves, not the apparent width? I've always grown Sativas, so I'm not familiar with the Indican traits, but, every plant I ever grew had thin, slender, leaves with longer internodes. But then again, if this is a cross of some kind, it could have the fat fingers of an indica, with the 'look' of a sativa I suppose...
I would inquire as to how a plant, without the application of colchine, become strikingly similar to a plant with an inordinate number of chromosomes.
Is it just a 'fluke' to simulate a chromosomic condition?
HG, do you consider 1 and 1/2 inches wide across to be a sativa trait? or is it the shape of the leaves, not the apparent width? I've always grown Sativas, so I'm not familiar with the Indican traits, but, every plant I ever grew had thin, slender, leaves with longer internodes. But then again, if this is a cross of some kind, it could have the fat fingers of an indica, with the 'look' of a sativa I suppose...