THE BROTHER'S GRUNT said:Nice looking plants j99jm. :aok: Here are our ladies. Sorry about the yellow in the pics but the lights were on and i didn't feel like moving them out this time. So far we have all females except one. For some reason she just don't wanna show us her stuff. :hubba:
Mutt said:BTW, less wattage used when switched to 120W worth of HID....Buds are 4x more dense then under 180W of flos....so in a nut shell....put the CFL's away and go get floods. Lil more up front (barely anything paid 20 bucks for a 55W CFL or 30 bucks for a 50W HPS....get the HPS) had to see for myself how well CFL's did....stick with a HID.
go for it dude. I still use CFL's for veg, but I can get the leaves within 2-3" and not burn the leaves. CFL's were hotter. IMEakirahz said:i got about 100 watts worth of CFL's right now, do you think if i ditched them and replaced them with a 70 watt HPS bulb (ballast on the outside of my grow cab) do you think i'd get better results then as well? How much heat does one of those 70 watt HPS bulbs put out, just the bulb by itself, not in a flood or a housing or anything. I just have no idea what sorta heat signature they got, if i could keep a 70 watt cool like i do my 100 watts of CFL then id probably try switching it up for some denser buds
CFL's were hotter.
akirahz said:... i was curious, if i buy the 70 watt hps one, would i be able to get away with using a 100 watt bulb?
BenDover said:Really? Wow, I guess that makes my decision easy to buy a 400w HPS for my flowering.
Back to the journal topic...
Those are looking beautiful guys! I may include some WW on my first seed order. :bongin: