TexasMonster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2009
- Messages
- 518
- Reaction score
- 106
Rolling Thunder said:No, the f-2 generation is never true breeding. If the f-1 was the progeny of two stablized parent seedlines, then it will generally have a single phenotype, and all will look alike. While it will have an appearance of being true breeding because all the f-1`s look alike, it is not true-breeding in reality. All outcrosses are unstable, by definition. However, let`s say for argument`s sake that the f-1 has a single phenotype. Then the f-2 will produce at least three phenotypes. Fifty percent of the f-2`s will look like the f-1, while twenty five percent will look more like IBL parent A and the remaining twenty-five percent will look more like IBL parent B. These are rough approximations.
So, the f-2 generation, then, is where the genetic heritage of the two IBL`s (inbred parent lines) begins to open up for the breeder. Now, if the f-1 has two phenotypes, and you select one parent from each phenotype to inbreed and create f-2 seed with, the loss in hybrid vigour will be less dramatic and noticeable in the f-2 progeny than if you were to select two parents with the same f-1 phenotype. It is a well established fact that the f-2 seed has less hybrid vigour than the f-1. If max yield, taste, and potency is what you desire, be strict about growing true f-1 seed stock! - RT
Thank You. I believe that its gonna take me a while before I get all that. I am going to have to learn where to acquire true f-1 seedstock. I think you may have given me a hint in the post above this one. Just to be clear, you are saying that some sites may say F-1 and it not be entirely true?