NewbOldster
Well-Known Member
Yeah, FTS!
Who all is taking the Covid19 Vax?
- Thread starter RonnieB
- Start date
user 60606
אשר
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2020
- Messages
- 10,031
- Reaction score
- 31,551
Nobody in the Federal facilities are wearing masks. I didn't even see one mask at Wally World yesterday.
Every once in awhile I will see some fool wearing a mask in a car by themselves.makes me want to run them off the road.
2 years before the infamous Great 2020 Reset Planned Demic my wife was at war with a Leukemic cancer and was advised by her Oncologist to wear a fibrous medical mask whenever in public. ... np
My wife reminds me all the time that we just don't know what the circumstances in life are of those that are wearing a mask , even up to the possibility of progressively lower IQs due to oxygen deprivation ... .
user 64919
Well-Known Member
NewbOldster
Well-Known Member
Why? I thought placebos were valid medical experimentation tool?
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Sudafed PE has been under scrutiny since 2007 and they tried to get it removed in 2015. All well before covid. Trying to link the removal to covid is "grabbing at straws". Regular Sudafed is effective.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Messages
- 17,304
- Reaction score
- 55,480
#7 big time. I learned to read lips a long time ago. If there's background noise, being able to understand what someone's saying is almost impossible when they're wearing a mask.
How did I do any of that linking or grabbing?
"Now decongestants are being pulled by the fda.........."
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Well lets see. This is a covid topic and you inject the removal of Sudafed PE (Phenylephrine) into the topic.....Seems obvious. You are trying to imply the 2 are related somehow yet the evidence does not support that at all. 
Triple,,,, Members do that all the time on Threads,,just about all threads. It's called thread drift. Thats what potheads do. No big deal brother. We are all friends here.
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Thats all fine and good but even his statement is false at this time. A committee recommended to the FDA that the oral versions of phenylephrine are not effective. Nothing has been removed yet and the FDA does not even have to abide by the recommendations of the committee.
Speculation at best but like i said....The hard evidence says otherwise.
A 2007 meta-analysis concluded that the evidence for its effectiveness is insufficient,[16] though another meta-analysis published shortly thereafter by researchers from GlaxoSmithKline found the standard 10-mg dose to be more effective than a placebo; however, the fact that GSK markets many products containing phenylephrine has raised some speculation regarding selective publishing and other controversial techniques.[17] A 2007 study by Wyeth Consumer Healthcare notes that 7 studies available in 1976 support the efficacy of phenylephrine at a 10 mg dosage.[18] The Food and Drug Administration withdrew the indication "for the temporary relief of nasal congestion associated with sinusitis" in 2007.[2]
Two studies published in 2009, examined the effects of phenylephrine on symptoms of allergic rhinitis by exposing people to pollen in a controlled, indoor environment. Neither study was able to distinguish between the effects of phenylephrine or a placebo. Pseudoephedrine and loratadine–montelukast therapy were found to be significantly more effective than both phenylephrine and placebo.[13][14]
Pseudoephedrine was previously much more commonly available in the United States, however, provisions of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 placed restrictions on the sale of pseudoephedrine products to prevent the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine. Since 2004, phenylephrine has been increasingly marketed as a substitute for pseudoephedrine; some manufacturers have changed the active ingredients of products to avoid the restrictions on sales.[19] Phenylephrine has been off-patent for some time, and many generic brands are available.[citation needed]
On 12 September 2023, an independent advisory committee to the FDA unanimously agreed that there is insufficient evidence showing that "orally administered phenylephrine is effective as a nasal decongestant". The committee also unanimously believed that this does not need further study. The FDA responded to the committee, stating it would take its advice under advisement
Last edited:
Well ill be sure to put him in a corner for being wrong.
DOG,,go to your corner and stay there until you figure out what you did wrong,, and dont come out until you take some Sudafed PE . Oh,,and wear a mask.
Triple thanks for getting him straight. I wouldn't want him confused.
DOG,,go to your corner and stay there until you figure out what you did wrong,, and dont come out until you take some Sudafed PE . Oh,,and wear a mask.
Triple thanks for getting him straight. I wouldn't want him confused.
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Well ill be sure to put him in a corner for being wrong. DOG,,go to your corner and stay there until you figure out what you did wrong.
Glad to see you on topic ya fking stoner. Stop pissing ppl off. 
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Faithful to what exactly and i can assure you im far from riled. If pointing out a false statement makes me look riled i dont know what to say. Sadly all it really did was make you look foolish, stoned or both.Always funny when you get the faithful riled up........lolz.
Sorry boss I will go get my 7th booster as well.
Triple Sec
Well-Known Member
Why would you try to imply i posted anything about that drug in quotes? Ive never mentioned it.
