4u2sm0ke
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2007
- Messages
- 17,344
- Reaction score
- 13,505
To Whom It May Concern,
While I applaud the state government's efforts to try and protect itself from the federal government, the current draft revision for medical marijuana laws would do great harm to the community of medical marijuana patients in our state. I think that the state registry could help law enforcement in determining who is allowed medical rights and who is not, and I believe that there will no longer be a need for collective grow "dispensaries" once I-502 cannabis storefronts are open to the public. However, by removing a patient's ability to produce (grow) their own medicine in their home the government would be putting HUGE, unfair economic pressure on medical patients. It is a simple matter of arithmetic.
First off, the draft suggests that the amount of usable cannabis that patients are allowed to possess be reduced from a month's supply (24 oz) to one week's supply (3 oz). This math in itself is faulty. Three is one eighth of twenty-four, and no month in the year has eight weeks. Therefore, it would be more reasonable to assume that six ounces would be one week's supply (as six is one quarter of twenty four, and most months have four-five weeks.) If patients cannot grow their own medicine they will be reliant on using the same outlets as recreational users. The last draft of the proposed pricing system suggested that the pre-tax price of cannabis be set at $12 per gram. So, even with the tax exemption that would be provided to medical users the average patient would be expected to spend $1008 (3 oz) to $2016 (6 oz) per week on their medicine. That adds up to $4032 to $8064 per month, or $48,384 to $96,768 per year. Let me repeat that: $96,768 per year! And how much of that would be taxed? None! Why force medical patients to buy from government run storefronts if the money they spent won't even be taxed? Recreational users do not require nearly as much cannabis, at most an ounce per week: none of which is necessary to control the side effects of debilitating disease or injury.
Please reconsider the following parts of your draft:
- The ability for medical marijuana patients to produce their medicine in their own home.
- The possession limits for medical marijuana patients.
The draft as it is written shows no respect for the well-being of patients.
Thank you,
Concerned Citizen.
Thank you for your comment. It will be shared with the Liquor Control Board.
Sincerely,
Ingrid Mungia
Ingrid Gourley Mungia
Staff Attorney
Washington State Liquor Control Board
(360.664-4522
*[email protected]
Rosebud said:Good letter 4U. Why is the liquor board talking to me about medicine anyway?
4u2sm0ke said:I know ..Right....I voted against 502 just for this reason...and like was said ...I feel the MMJ should be protected under state constitution like Colorado is..I sure hope we stand up and not allow what the State wants...if the state gets what they want I have no choice but to stop growing Meds for myself and others...and would have to back doing this illegal...Ill keep yall posted...Im going to the meeting again Sunday
:bong:
ozzydiodude said:Hey Brother anything out of staters can do to add our 2cents? or in my case no since but lotsa sensi
Enter your email address to join: