erwinsweeney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 190
I backed the lights a few more inches away. See if that changes anything.
I, too, think LED is the lighting technology of the future (to the extent of lighting technology that we know exists / who can guess what the government is still hiding from us?) due to it's ability to produce finely tuned frequencies of light at increasing higher REwatts. Eventually, I suspect that the process will become computerized where banks of LED's designed to produce specific arrays of light frequencies will be attached to a computer monitoring system that will be able to discern what frequencies of light the plant is deficient in and automatically adjust to maintain a maximum photosynthetic rate. It may sound a bit sci-fi, but there's no reason that it can't happen and if you follow the trajectory of LED and computer technology, it seems to me that the two will converge at this point. As for your little, green tacos, moving the light away is most likely the correct move. I like to hold the back of my hand at the top of the canopy level to see if the light feels too intense. Sometimes I wonder if this makes any sense, given that these are really meant to grow in full sun and if you hold your hand out in the sun, it pretty much always feels too hot. If you aren't doing it already, you may want to add a little fan inside the tent just to stir the air through the canopy. 100F on a breezy day doesn't feel like 100F in my attic. MPBerwinsweeney said:I was just looking at my plants and noticed one of the plants at the top, the leaves are slightly taco'd. Here are two pics of it. Is this something to worry about? I just added the LED back into the setup yesterday. The CFL is about 5" away, and the LED is about 6" away. Should I back them off a bit or what?
Those are some crystal clear shots of your tent walls, but I'm sure the plants look gorgeous too, lol. If you want to get those close-up shots without having to buy a telephoto lens and a digital slr camera, hold a magnifying glass in front of your camera and adjust the distances between plant, lens and camera until the autofocus locks on your target. I've gotten some pretty sweet close-up pics this way using my little point and shoot digi. I would actually like to see what you are trying to show us. MPBerwinsweeney said:Well. When I took a look at my plants last night, I could finally notice some changes around the nodes, and at the tops. The flower growth is much more abundant, and they are noticeably larger in size. They are forming very close to each other now, and the pistils are longer and fatter. They have been flowering for 1 week now. So far they seem to enjoy the humidifier. I believe my next purchase is going to be a humidity gauge and controller. Seems like there is going to always be a "next purchase" for me. Just like any other hobby I guess.
MootPointBlank said:Those are some crystal clear shots of your tent walls, but I'm sure the plants look gorgeous too, lol. If you want to get those close-up shots without having to buy a telephoto lens and a digital slr camera, hold a magnifying glass in front of your camera and adjust the distances between plant, lens and camera until the autofocus locks on your target. I've gotten some pretty sweet close-up pics this way using my little point and shoot digi. I would actually like to see what you are trying to show us. MPB
420benny said:Looks good. I totally agree about adding a fan to move that air. Not only will it help with temp, but the plants will be much happier. More co2 coming in will increase growth, the breeze will keep the mold and fungus gnat issues better in check and the breeze will also strengthen all the stalks and branches by their movement all the time. Look around, there's a bunch of choices for fans these days. Cheap, too. Good luck and look up macro setting in the camera instructions. It makes taking closeups so easy.
Nice... I can see the beginnings of some dense bud formations. I look forward to seeing what the handycam will do. There's nothing like hi-res bud ****. Too bad we can't post video, it would make tutorials much more effective and engaging. I swear I've perfected every environmental variable in my grow and I'm still getting mixed results. But that's a story for my own journal. Keep on rockin' in the free world. MPBerwinsweeney said:I think these are a little bit better MPB. I got a new HD Handycam, and it also takes ultra high quality still shots, however I haven't figured out how to use the software with it. So pretty soon I'm sure I will be able to show nice pics. These so far, I have used my 5 megapixel phone camera. Not too bad for a phone. Those last 3 sucked, I agree. Thanks for checkin in.
GrowinGreen said:hey erwin- looking good man. They are going to start taking off here soon. Looks like you are going to have a nice cola on there- is today their 11th day in flower?
Big_Blunt said:looking good, how close do you have the lights to the plants?
A lumen is merely a PERCEIVED power of light. In other words, it's the amount of light our eyes can see, and our eyes pick up green/yellow much more than red or violet, and we can't see infrared/ultraviolet. That's why the lumen factor can't be compared to LED's, because they focus on a few very specific areas of the spectrum that our eyes are incapable of seeing.Hick said:A "regular" 150 watt HPS starts out at about 16000 lumens
..not to be dissing your success in any manner, she looks wonderfull. And I know 'heat' is virtually a non-issue w/ leds. Just saying.......the economics don't make good sense, "if" your numbers are correct. For only a slight increase in kilowatt useage, around 5X the lumens ??
Enter your email address to join: