NYCD I apologize if it wrinkled your panties. I "never" ridiculed you or berated you.
I made a sarcastic 'jest' at the
ridiculous price you quoted.
But a mod that comes into threads and berates people trying to deabte a subject is not a mod, he/she is a thug.
:rofl:...:baby:
I have "repeatedly" said that leds are getting better and better. AND that they will "
soon" play a dominate factor in growing.
You've done nothing but come in here making claims, you haven't "proven" anything. I'm 'not' convinced by quotes from a magazine that relies/survives/profits off of sponsors/advertisers. So where do "YOU" get off ridiculing/berating/name calling 'me'?...
In the free market world we live in, a 600watt LED priced at $1,500-$2,500 would simply have no market against a 600HPS at less than $300 if the LED could not outperform the HPS in both production and cost savings.
You said it yourself... I don't see growers rushing out and standing in line to pay $2500 for 'inferior' lights. YES I say 'inferior'.. until I see growers(plural) with experience and knowledge useing them AND getting satisfactory "results", I'm still calling a spade a spade...
For that same $2500 you could buy better than 10,000 watts of HIDs. Or light over 200 sq ft effectively. Even calculating it at less than 1 gram per watt, that comes out in excess of 20
pounds of product. (has a gram per watt ever been accomplished with led?) I really don't know, but I doubt it.
I know the prices are coming down, I know they are becoming more popular,I know they are getting better on an almost a daily bases, and I know that they are yet to match HIDs in effectiveness in the grow room.
I've not dissed anyone for experimenting, or bringing new and competent information to the table. There have been a half dozen or so LED grows here, not a one has shown that LED can compare to HID in production. Everyone wants to "debate" it, but when the "pudding is in the bowl", they failed to do anything but just THAT.. debate it. :hubba: