Hick said:
Any cutting that you take from a 2 month old plant.."IS:" two months old also. It does not, can not go back to infant/seedling stage.
I do agree, to a point, with the longer veg/maturity and it's relationship to potency. Plants should be grown to "sexual maturity" before flowering for maximum potency. Though "I" don't believe that 3 months are required. Alternating nodes and/or preflowers are a sign of sexual maturity.
I was quoting Nevil, or at least the 1989 (?), Super Sativa Seed Club catalog. Nevil was a very early breeder and if someone is under the age of 35 or 40 or so probably never has heard of them, or him.
Of course a cutting is the same age as the mother, no question. I would guess that Nevil, being a breeder, did the 24 hr light trick to speed generations along and noted this as a side effect. I don't know, but it makes sense to keep the cutting on the same light regimen as the mother.
Sort of like when you do the light poisoning trick on flowering plants and turn them hermi, 24 hours on a cutting from a mother that was on a 18/6 regimen MAY make it bounce weird.
Again, I don't know, since both my clones and mothers are under the same lights and I don't feel the need to experiment. It's worked for 19 years, so why fix what ain't broke?
Besides, other than north of the arctic circle does anyplace on earth get 24 hrs of sunlight? Everything needs at least some downtime to recharge.
Not trying to start an argument, or state anything as gospel, just quoting some anecdotal information that has worked for me. At least it worked very well with the Williams Wonder I got from them in 1991.
EDIT: Dang! I thought it was here, but over at that forum with the four and the two and the zero, magazine, a kind gentleman has scanned a late '80s SSSC catalog into the 'Plant and Bud Photos' sub forum. Might give the younguns an idea of what the oldtimers were up to 20+ years ago. Have a look.
DD