PencilHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 2,002
- Reaction score
- 1,962
umbra said:my spin on the subject:
when using chemical nutes, you are feeding the plant. the nutes are designed to be absorbed directly by the plant and the medium itself, doesn't really matter. With real organics you are feeding the soil and not the plant, per se. whatever organic matter is available will be broken down into a usable form to the plant. if we were talking about an outdoor 10,000 acre grow, the benefits of real organics would be more understandable. If you ever talked to real farmers, dead and nutrient poor soil is a real problem. using tons of chem nutes may create plants today, but the long term viability and productivity of the soil will be depleated, because the chem nutes don't feed the soil. some of the problems with using chem nutes are high nitrate and phosphate run off or ground water contamination. organic farming has none of these issues. this type of farming is referred to as sustainable. the challenge of the 21st century is sustainability; whether it is energy consumption, carbon footprint, or farming.
because so many growers are indoors and have small grows, all that matters is their current grow. but farming practices effect us all in a very global way. i'm dialing in the full organic method and believe it will rival hydro in terms of yield, flowering time, and potency.
You mean all this high nute run-off from all the golf courses and other chemically addicted flora in FL are going to have a negative effect on our lakes and streams? Our aquifer? Gadzooks, what's next, you're gonna try to tell me we're gonna muck up the Everglades if we don't stop our evil ways?
Decent spin, Umbra, thanks. That's the lofty goal to aspire to. I'm a Bahia grass growing/zeroscaping skeptic--my neighbors feed their St. Auggie till their sidewalks turn green from the water and algae. No prob--it just runs down the street to the lake at the bottom of the hill, and, as they say, can't see it from my house.