im glad we could argue with no more mocking i think that no matter how many times you flood and drain you cannot supply as much air as a good airpump does, ive done both compared em myself and nouvellechef also did it and reported dwc to be superior. the DWC of mj is done using airstone and water level low below netpots so the roots are suspended in air and getting fine bubbles mist from the airstones and NOT from a hybrid or aero/DWC just an airstone no misters...PieRsquare said:They can call it anything they like. It's NFT. The "floating raft" title is to differentiate between that type of growing and all the others. It's a sub-type of NFT.
Stop saying things that aren't true. I never said "ebb&flow is better was based on the fact that in ebb&flow the roots are getting air and not submerged". Now you're the one making things up.
Ebb and flow creates a vacuum that draws oxygen all the way to the bottom of the media. It totally saturates the entire root mass with oxygen. DWC does not. In a comparison of the two, Ebb and Flow supplies more oxygen to the roots if the fill and drain cycles are proper. There is no way for DWC to provide that much oxygen to the roots. These are facts, not opinions.
zem said:im glad we could argue with no more mocking i think that no matter how many times you flood and drain you cannot supply as much air as a good airpump does, ive done both compared em myself and nouvellechef also did it and reported dwc to be superior. the DWC of mj is done using airstone and water level low below netpots so the roots are suspended in air and getting fine bubbles mist from the airstones and NOT from a hybrid or aero/DWC just an airstone no misters...
lololol,NEVER GIVE UP DUDE!PieRsquare said:This has gone far enough.
It's in books. Not online. You have to actually pick the book up and read it. It's been said by so many different people who have actually tested it in hundreds of experiments that it's pointless to call it an opinion. It's not an opinion, it's proven fact.
I'm sorry. I've tried to share my knowledge and have received nothing but static. I'm done, you win. I'm out. It's not worth it.
blue balls are not fun.ishnish said:do they have glow-in-the-dark balls?
PieRsquare said:This has gone far enough.
It's in books. Not online. You have to actually pick the book up and read it. It's been said by so many different people who have actually tested it in hundreds of experiments that it's pointless to call it an opinion. It's not an opinion, it's proven fact.
I'm sorry. I've tried to share my knowledge and have received nothing but static. I'm done, you win. I'm out. It's not worth it.
Enter your email address to join: