Erbal
Cheeky Green Monster
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 10
In a case decided yesterday, [URLKentucky v. King[/URL], the US Supreme Court has ruled that cops who smell marijuana coming from your home can break down your door and arrest you, just as long as they knock first and claim to have heard you destroying evidence.
They don’t need a warrant or probable cause, either. Today in America, police can now randomly patrol neighborhoods and apartment complexes sniffing around for pot. When they smell it, they can knock on your door and then break it down, claiming they heard noises from within.
The Frederick v. Morse[/I]);
[*]that religions using Schedule I ayahuasca or Schedule I peyote as a holy sacrament should have a First Amendment exception to drug law prosecution ([]Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal[/URL]), but religions that use Schedule I cannabis made the mistake of choosing too popular an illegal holy sacrament ([]USA v. Quaintence[/URL]);
[*]and that police who’ve stopped your vehicle may run a drug-sniffing dog around your car even without any probable cause to believe the driver is involved with drugs in any way (["]Illinois v. Caballes[/URL]).[/LIST] So long as the law says marijuana is contraband and its possession and cultivation a crime, the federal courts will always find a way to rule to maintain marijuana prohibition. The solution lies in Congress (depressing as that may be) and changing the law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a sad day indeed. I wonder how this is going to affect the police force on more local scale, especially with 16 US States supporting medicinal.
Sir, you were legally growing your medication so we had to bust down your door. /facepalm
They don’t need a warrant or probable cause, either. Today in America, police can now randomly patrol neighborhoods and apartment complexes sniffing around for pot. When they smell it, they can knock on your door and then break it down, claiming they heard noises from within.
The Frederick v. Morse[/I]);
[*]that religions using Schedule I ayahuasca or Schedule I peyote as a holy sacrament should have a First Amendment exception to drug law prosecution ([]Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal[/URL]), but religions that use Schedule I cannabis made the mistake of choosing too popular an illegal holy sacrament ([]USA v. Quaintence[/URL]);
[*]and that police who’ve stopped your vehicle may run a drug-sniffing dog around your car even without any probable cause to believe the driver is involved with drugs in any way (["]Illinois v. Caballes[/URL]).[/LIST] So long as the law says marijuana is contraband and its possession and cultivation a crime, the federal courts will always find a way to rule to maintain marijuana prohibition. The solution lies in Congress (depressing as that may be) and changing the law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a sad day indeed. I wonder how this is going to affect the police force on more local scale, especially with 16 US States supporting medicinal.
Sir, you were legally growing your medication so we had to bust down your door. /facepalm