New laws attack South Australian Hydroponic shops

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

FruityBud

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
3,399
Hydroponics shops will be hit with even tougher regulations as the State Government moves to curb cannabis production across the state.

The new legislation, an Australian first, will be aimed at combating the sale of equipment for cultivating hydroponic cannabis.

Police Minister Michael Wright said the move would make it easier for police to track who was buying the equipment.

"If you are using the equipment to grow tomatoes then you have nothing to fear but if it is for growing cannabis then you can expect a visit from the police," Mr Wright said.

Adelaide has the highest number of hydroponics shops in Australia on a per capita basis with at least 51 identified businesses.

Under the proposed changes, people buying certain equipment will be required to submit to a 100 point ID check with their details electronically transferred to police.

It will result in:

Hydroponic dealers having to adhere to a strict licensing regime including a fit and proper person test which takes into account reputation, honesty and integrity of the person and the people they associate with.

Employees will also be required to undergo a fit and proper person test.

Police will be able to object to an application for a licence or employment on the grounds of criminal intelligence.

Licensed dealers having verify the identity of purchasers of specialist equipment by way of 100-point ID check.

Dealers will need to maintain electronic records of all specialist items sold with the records forwarded to police in "as close to real time" as possible.

The Government has been examining the changes since March last year.

hxxp://tinyurl.com/dblhdh
 
Not quite, but ever so slowly we seems to losing basic rights.

Not cool.

-Trippy
 
"A fit and proper person test",.....I have to wonder just how many supporters of this law could actually pass this test. When one group gets to decide,based on totally subjective criteria,who is or isn't "fit and proper" you know we're' all in a world of hurt.
I can't help but notice one of the criterior for being considdered "unfit and improper" is an acociation with criminals or people of questionable honesty or integrity. How about cops? They are involved with criminals on a frquent basis.
This is nothing more than neo-moralism run amok.
 
This will open up a huge black market trade.

Lots of shops will get broken into.

Do those in so called power not have the ability to see past what they plan to enforce and its repercussions?

:peace:
 
basic prohibition at it's finest, as HIE said this will increase crime, not reduce, as prohibition often does
 
Marsrover1 said:
lets all pitch in and buy a big island somewere nice and tropical and call it WEEDSVILLE yes we require a pee test on a reg basis and if low or no thc is found u will be deported

OOOH, OOOOOH! Pick me as the sheriff please. We are going to have some fun.:D
Rule #1- Everybody will quit work at 4:20 and light up:hubba:
 
420benny said:
OOOH, OOOOOH! Pick me as the sheriff please. We are going to have some fun.:D
Rule #1- Everybody will quit work at 4:20 and light up:hubba:

amendment to rule #1
work will cease to exist by 2:20 everyday so that a powernap may ensue in preparation for 4:20 pm. Work will not resume until 1:20 the following day.

A standard 1 hour lunch is mandatory.
 
rule 2: those found to be in possession of weed must share with at least but not limited to one person.
 
kalikisu said:
rule 2: those found to be in possession of weed must share with at least but not limited to one person.

rule# 3


possession does not exist

Weed is evenly distributed by all, each smoke session muct be coupled with a fresh cold bottle of Coke, and a smile.
 
Sounds like that movie "the beach" but they didn't have the ice cold coke...I'm ready to go.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top